Skip to main content

A welcome decision

Finally the I & B Ministry as decided to act and issued a ultimatum to the obscene deodorant commercials to be taken off the air. It's a welcome decision. 

In my earlier blog titled anything and everything...advertisement I had expressed my views on the same. I believe the there are whole lot of others too who feel the same about the obscenity of such ads or commercials.

However its unfortunate that The of India feels its unnecessary moral policing. May be The Times has not watched some of these ads and hence their view. Each time I see these commercials on air it makes me feel awkward watching it with my family. They are highly distasteful and portray women who just want to drool over men at the drop of hats. Cleverly enough The Times does not mention these ads. They mention which may still fall into the acceptable category. But what about the one where a woman playing with kids in the family, is all of a sudden drawn by the fragrance of a particular deo ...gets pulled into a room ...latches it and is shown lustily pulling off her saree??? I mean what is the ad about? Is the person her husband? Is the woman married? or she is spinster? For me its just nothing but...looking at women as just objects of desire. and my question to Times is has our society changed so much in the past 20 years as it says..for women to sleep to with anyone any time and so easily?

Fortunately enough the counter view represents the viewpoints which I strongly agree with. If one does remember the Amul Macho commercial (the one with woman washing the clothes...provocative ads can be suggestively and sensitively done without drooling on to someone's lap or dropping your clothes).

So a welcome decision from the I & B Ministry. Hope they keep up the good work in near future as well. and  let me inform you that some of the prominent admen like Pralhad Kakkad too have supported the ministry on its stand.

For readers I reproducing the Times of India View and Counter view column published in today's Mumbai edition. 

I&B ministry cracks the whip on deodorant advertisements


Times View
Unnecessary moral policing 
The information and broadcasting ministry has issued a diktat to the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), asking it to take action against some deodorant advertisements the ministry has found to be obscene. At this rate, the ministry may just as well appoint itself one of the last outposts of Victorian morality. Suggestive and playful the ads might be, but they can hardly be categorised as soft porn. A lot of contemporary culture is sexually suggestive. Any attempt to ban this is about as futile as King Canute ordering the waves to turn back. 
Most people would laugh if exposed to an ad that depicts a gaggle of women chasing a man who sprays on a particular deodorant. But it seems such humour is lost on the I&B ministry, for whom such ads become objects of ire. Or take a recent ad on which the ministry cracked its whip, which showed women gobbling up a chocolate man. The ministry’s objection is that such ads portray women as ‘objects of desire’, although in many of these cases it’s the men who fit that description much more. Little humour, little desire, but plenty of ire seems to be the ministry’s prescription for society. 
The range of what is acceptable television content changes organically from time to time. What might have been inappropriate 20 years ago may well be run of the mill today. Advertising needs to push the boundaries if it is to connect with an audience. In any case there is a generally accepted principle to shift potentially adult content to suitable late night timings. Most of the advertisements in question are telecast outside family viewing time. In such a scenario, the I&B ministry’s order can only be described as high-handed and out of sync with contemporary television viewing preferences. It must step back and allow self-regulation through the ASCI to take its course. 

Counter View
Ads are objectionable: Ajay Vaishnav 
In a very timely intervention, the I&B ministry has directed advertisers to either modify obscene deodorant ads within five days or take them off the air. The advertisements in question are overtly sexual and depict women as commod
ities. Not surprisingly, they have deservedly drawn criticism from various quarters on both legal and moral  grounds. Legally, they have violated the country’s advertising code, which categorically states that the portrayal of the female form should be tasteful and aesthetic and within the well established norms of decency. 
More than the legal angle, some of these raunchy commercials using female models in racy storylines have thrown morality out of the window. In their greed to promote and sell their product, an advertiser has gone as far as to suggest relationships within an extended family. Whether or not such ad strategy relying on titillation increases the appeal and thus, sales of the product, it is definitely in bad taste, as well as bad for the moral health of society. Moral decay cannot be allowed to set in at any cost. Further, to depend on cheap sensationalism to sell a product implies a lack of imagination and creativity in presenting the product. 

Another pernicious effect of these ads is the wrong psychological impression they create on minors. To expect the availability of parental guidance on every occasion is impossible. The suggestion to air offensive ads away from a prime-time slot is to deflect attention from the core issue. The advertising industry slavishly follows the West, but our society has different standards. Television has a wide audience and complaints about obscene advertising pour in from many quarters. In setting the boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not, the ministry is just doing its job.

(Times of India, Mumbai, 28-05-2011)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Power We Yield - A Reflection on Meiyazhagan

I recently watched a Tamil movie that left me reflecting deeply on the intricate, often unseen threads of connection that bind us to others. Despite having watched it twice and appreciating its nuanced storytelling, I still struggle to pronounce the name of the mysterious relative, Meiyazhagan . The name may evade me, but the emotions it evokes resonate deeply. The story unfolds with Arul, a man who embarks on an emotional journey to reconnect with his roots. During his visit to Thanjavur, Arul is shown his childhood bicycle, now a cherished relic in the home of a relative he barely remembers. The bicycle, meticulously maintained, symbolizes resilience and love—it once served as a livelihood tool for the family and now stands as a "god" in their household. The relative, referred to as Nandhini’s husband, shows unwavering affection and generosity toward Arul, despite the latter's inability to recall his name or their shared history. This anonymity does not dimi...

Day 19 - The Power of Multidisciplinary Approach

In an era of specialization, many of the world's most successful people advocate for a broader, more holistic view—one that embraces a multidisciplinary approach to life. This approach involves combining knowledge and skills from various fields, leading to better problem-solving, creativity, and adaptability. Think of a Renaissance person like Leonardo da Vinci, whose expertise spanned art, science, and engineering, shaping innovation for centuries. Today, the importance of a multidisciplinary mindset has become even more crucial in navigating the complexities of modern life. The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Approach David Epstein’s book, Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World, provides compelling arguments for why those who explore a wide variety of interests often outperform their more specialized peers in the long run. Epstein highlights examples from sports, business, and science, showing that people who dip their toes into different fields are often...

The 70+ Hour Work Week Debate: An Intentional Grab for Attention or a Serious Commentary?

The recent debates surrounding the idea of a 70+ hour work week have sparked intense reactions, drawing both applause and criticism. While some view it as a badge of honor for high achievers, others see it as an outdated notion that glorifies burnout. But a deeper question emerges: is this debate merely a deliberate attempt to grab eyeballs and enjoy a fleeting hour of glory? In today’s media-driven world, controversial statements often gain disproportionate attention, flooding news feeds and capturing the public’s imagination. Leaders making such proclamations may find themselves in the limelight, relishing the buzz around their bold, albeit polarizing, remarks. But at what cost does this attention come? The Underlying Risks and Downsides The glorification of excessive work hours raises several pressing concerns: Burnout Culture : Does endorsing 70+ hour work weeks perpetuate a culture where exhaustion is equated with success? How does this impact mental health and well-be...