Skip to main content

Two Perspectives. One Movie. Rush.

Recently I happened to watch the movie - Rush. It depicts the rivalry between James Hunt and Niki Lauda former Formula One champions who fiercely competed against each other. The movie tracks the evolution of their rivalry from Formula Three Circuit to Formula One Championship of 1976 where it reached its peak with both drivers willing to  push themselves to the breaking point of physical and psychological endurance and risk everything to become the world champion in a sport with no margin for error: if you make a mistake, you die. 
The story also highlights their distinctly different personal styles and lives, on and off the track of both. Though both acknowledge their mutual admiration and inspiration they draw form each other they remain critical of each others approach and prefer to do it their own way.



James Hunt's Approach
James approach to driving is driven by the passion, fun and the thrill of it. "The more closer you are to death the more alive you are. It's the only way to drive as if each day is your last," he says. His rush comes from the speed. His rush comes from aggression. On a day that really matters James is willing to put his life on line. For him more powerful than the fear of death is the will to win. That's what makes him unbeatable on his day and ups his chances to win the championship. Consistency, however, is not his forte but he makes up for that with his aggression for speed and passion to drive and more importantly to be one up on Niki. For James bringing in the percentage of risk involved (Niki's approach) to the race takes the fun away from the game. It's like killing the sport. The fun is not just limited to the track but life too. James is least bothered about getting back to testing and preparing for the upcoming season. James happy with what he has achieved, having proved to the world, anyone who doubted him and himself what he needed to prove does not consider it necessary to return to the preparing for the next season but is happy enjoying his reign as a champion. "Some of life's moment need to be for pleasure", he says, "there's no point in having a million cups, medals and planes, if you don't have any fun. How's that winning?" he questions Niki.

Niki Lauda's Approach
Niki's approach to driving is that of a cool, calculating genius who relies on precision. For him driving full throttle increases risk and when you are not being paid for it there is no point to go full throttle. For him to be a champion, it takes more than being quick. To be a champion one has to really believe it says Niki. It's about looking at the big picture, its about remaining focused, its about contributing to the design and engineering of his race car at the cost of not being liked by even his own team. He is strong believer in discipline. The calculating and methodical genius in him willing to take risk up to 20% risk which is he believes is inherent to the race, anything beyond is not worth risking life for. It's this belief which sees him returning to the pit after a near fatal accident and giving up on a almost certain championship in race where the risks are far too high. For Niki what one has achieved is history, you need to move on to the next. Whether you are champion or not you need start practicing and preparing for the way ahead.
The movie highlights both the perspectives without taking sides. Both perspectives hold true and illustrates that believing in your own approach leads to winning. Both approaches have their pro's and con's.
But the real question one needs to answer is how far are you willing to commit to your approach and go the extra mile....driving as if it's your last day and enjoy every bit of it or take the focused, disciplined and methodical way. The choice is yours.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Power We Yield - A Reflection on Meiyazhagan

I recently watched a Tamil movie that left me reflecting deeply on the intricate, often unseen threads of connection that bind us to others. Despite having watched it twice and appreciating its nuanced storytelling, I still struggle to pronounce the name of the mysterious relative, Meiyazhagan . The name may evade me, but the emotions it evokes resonate deeply. The story unfolds with Arul, a man who embarks on an emotional journey to reconnect with his roots. During his visit to Thanjavur, Arul is shown his childhood bicycle, now a cherished relic in the home of a relative he barely remembers. The bicycle, meticulously maintained, symbolizes resilience and love—it once served as a livelihood tool for the family and now stands as a "god" in their household. The relative, referred to as Nandhini’s husband, shows unwavering affection and generosity toward Arul, despite the latter's inability to recall his name or their shared history. This anonymity does not dimi...

Day 19 - The Power of Multidisciplinary Approach

In an era of specialization, many of the world's most successful people advocate for a broader, more holistic view—one that embraces a multidisciplinary approach to life. This approach involves combining knowledge and skills from various fields, leading to better problem-solving, creativity, and adaptability. Think of a Renaissance person like Leonardo da Vinci, whose expertise spanned art, science, and engineering, shaping innovation for centuries. Today, the importance of a multidisciplinary mindset has become even more crucial in navigating the complexities of modern life. The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Approach David Epstein’s book, Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World, provides compelling arguments for why those who explore a wide variety of interests often outperform their more specialized peers in the long run. Epstein highlights examples from sports, business, and science, showing that people who dip their toes into different fields are often...

The 70+ Hour Work Week Debate: An Intentional Grab for Attention or a Serious Commentary?

The recent debates surrounding the idea of a 70+ hour work week have sparked intense reactions, drawing both applause and criticism. While some view it as a badge of honor for high achievers, others see it as an outdated notion that glorifies burnout. But a deeper question emerges: is this debate merely a deliberate attempt to grab eyeballs and enjoy a fleeting hour of glory? In today’s media-driven world, controversial statements often gain disproportionate attention, flooding news feeds and capturing the public’s imagination. Leaders making such proclamations may find themselves in the limelight, relishing the buzz around their bold, albeit polarizing, remarks. But at what cost does this attention come? The Underlying Risks and Downsides The glorification of excessive work hours raises several pressing concerns: Burnout Culture : Does endorsing 70+ hour work weeks perpetuate a culture where exhaustion is equated with success? How does this impact mental health and well-be...