It was early in my career.
I was swamped with work — something important my Director had asked me to complete.
In the middle of that rush, a few candidates had arrived for their interviews.
I kept them waiting.
My Director walked in, looked around, and asked gently,
“Why are the candidates waiting?”
I explained, a little defensively,
“I’m working on the task you gave me… it’ll take me another half an hour or so.”
He nodded, then said something I carry with me to this day.
“Never keep candidates waiting.
It’s our need — we called them here.
It’s our responsibility to honour their time.
Never make them wait — not for the interview, not for the outcome.
Internal work can wait.
A bad candidate experience?
That leaves a scar. They may never come back.”
He wasn’t angry.
Just... clear.
And right.
That day, something shifted in me.
Since then, I’ve followed that lesson to the T.
Today, when I see posts asking candidates to "be patient," "be understanding," or "trust the process," I can't help but remember that moment.
Yes, candidates should be respectful.
But empathy is not a one-way street.
With all the technology we have today, sending a response — even a ‘no’ — isn’t hard.
It’s not about time.
It’s about priorities.
And the truth?
Organizations need candidates
more than candidates need jobs.
Every job seeker is a human being.
Someone anxious about their EMI.
Someone supporting a family.
Someone starting over after a setback.
“Any form of delay is disrespecting the candidate,” my Director had said.
He didn’t mince words.
Behind every HR title is a human.
But the same holds true for every application.
Let’s not forget that.
Comments
Post a Comment